It is a big confusion among clients and developers to decide which architectural framework best suits their requirements. All three types have their benefits as well as disadvantages. It depends on the reasons you are looking to solve with the web application.
Below mentioned are the three main types of web application architectural frameworks that you can consider.
1.HTML based server-side web application architecture
This type of main benefit of this type of architecture is that it can be implemented very easily. This is mainly because the URL receives HTML content by default. As known beforehand, optimizing it for search engines is far easier than the other two architectures.is most widely used in the current industry. It works when the main serves generate content in HTML format, and the client receives it as a real HTML page. It was the first appearance in the web architectures’ sphere, thus coining its name, ‘Web 1.0’. As it requires sending in huge amounts of data, the client must wait until the transmission is complete. Thus, in terms of responsiveness or usability, it is not that great. The
Regarding development speed, it is the top-ranking one among the three, especially due to the long time it has been around in the industry. It allows users to choose from wide language servers and specific frameworks for specific requirements. But in terms of performance, it may lag a bit in the race to the other architectures, again, thanks to the large data transmission. But if you want to convert the website for mobile optimization, it will be problematic, though it might be more secure for computer usage. The worst part is it will bring up a cached page in case of offline services, as all the browser contents are manifested with the server’s emphasis.
2. Widget web app architecture
3. Single Page web app architecture
It is a service-oriented web application architecture framework called ‘Web 2.0’. But it is not the exact term for the process. This is mainly due to one deviation – it asks users to fill in and repeatedly adjust the contents. It constitutes all projects and services that users can improve and develop independently. Wikis, blogs, and social media platforms are the most common example of this architectural framework.
However, regarding likability and search engine optimization services, it is one of the least preferred methods, as users need to adopt specific tools and mechanisms to finish the processes. It is hard to promote the page and even slow to develop. The only benefit that makes it a better choice over the other two variants is its performance speed. So, if performance is your prime focus, it is your option. It is even great to convert websites to desktop or as the basic platform is the same. It is also great for working offline, allowing users to save data and application parts on storage devices.