When discussing medical errors, malpractice and negligence are often used interchangeably, but they don’t mean the same thing in the courtroom. But how do you know which applies to your case? To distinguish between the two, you’ll need to establish several factors.
Duty And Responsibility
Duty to the patient is one of the prime elements of a medical malpractice suit. It implies that the person involved has the education and professional knowledge to provide the care. On the other hand, medical negligence can result from simple carelessness; the individual charged with it needn’t even be a medical professional. Duty is generally one of the easiest aspects of medical malpractice to prove, as any doctor actively treating a patient must provide the appropriate standard of care. But establishing duty is only the beginning.
Foresee The Consequences
The next key factor in any malpractice case is proving that the doctor’s outcome was foreseeable in question. For example, every doctor knows what happens if an instrument is left in a body cavity – it can cause pain, infection, and even death. These are foreseeable outcomes, yet surgeons accidentally leave tools behind about 39 times a week. Such errors may not be discovered for months or years after the incident.
due to medical negligence during his birth and $15.35 million for a child left with brain damage after negligent use of a vacuum extractor during labor. Neither of these cases was predictable like those suffered by Glenford Turner, a veteran whose surgeon left a scalpel in his abdomen during surgery – but they do share something in common: injury.
Identifying The Injury
Injury is another key component of any malpractice case; you can’t argue malpractice with a normal outcome. Though the standard of care can be normal, there can still be injury – 37% of cases aren’t associated with an error – the reverse isn’t true. Injuries are a common feature.
Negligence often results in injury, but as noted above, the damage isn’t foreseeable based on the preceding events. When trying to establish a legal claim, lawyers will generally requisition your medical records to determine the sequence of events leading up to an injury, consult with doctors and other medical professionals who can evaluate the likelihood of such an outcome, and determine whether errors were made or if the damage is a known outcome of the surgery. These factors play a role in determining whether a case is one of malpractice or negligence or if it has legal standing at all.
We are a litigious society, and at any given time, there are 95 malpractice suits for every 100 doctors. Most of these are dropped or settled out of court, but that doesn’t mean there aren’t valid suits among them. As a patient, you should always consult a lawyer if you believe you have been the victim of medical malpractice or negligence. They can help you determine whether you have a case and if it meets the standard for malpractice or the lower bar of failure. You can’t navigate these situations on your own.
