I’m going to help you in on a touch mystery approximately the Feminist Agenda™: we’re no longer without a doubt too troubled about the same rights and physical autonomy and all that other guff. No, what we’re honestly interested in is equal distress. We want to make guys go through. (Why else do you observed they have been called the suffragettes?) Evolution of man: the rise and rise of the male wellbeing sector Read greater You can believe, then, how my heart sang whilst the Observer posted a bit over the weekend called “What now not to put on in case you are a man over 50”. Finally! Progress! After centuries of girls being given rigid rules about how they should get dressed and behave that allow them to be “age-appropriate,” men are sooner or later getting equal treatment. Welcome to hell, fellas! We’ve were given a stringent dress code here. Weirdly, the Observer’s sage sartorial recommendation didn’t go down properly with loads of guys. Judging via the commenting phase, readers regarded to object to being informed that carrying a couple of Converses after 50 is a “warning sign of someone desperately trying to grasp on their adolescents.” Nor did many readers react kindly to the notion that baseball hats and combat trousers had been on the “to ditch” list for the self-respecting older man. Similarly, there did now not appear to be a lot of appreciation for the remark: “A lot of men entering their 50s fall into one of the camps … the ones who’ve given up, and those who don’t know while to offer it up.” Really, it’s a shame the piece didn’t make clean that uncouth language doesn’t fit a man of any age, due to the fact the general reaction to the thing appeared to be “fuck off.” I remember that being lectured on how to get dressed “age-as it should be” is a touch traumatic; however, we all ought to face harsh organic truths. The fact is, the body of a 25-12 months-antique man is splendid. The body of a person of fifty is not great in any respect. It is even less awesome in reasonably-priced shoes and a baseball hat. I don’t make the policies, I’m afraid; that’s simply how the arena works. It’s unhappy such a lot of men were given hysterical over an editorial that was best trying to cause them to look a bit less hideous.
The Observer article didn’t move far sufficient in policing guys’ garb picks and planting age and appearance-related insecurities. As it seems but, capitalism and our image-obsessed subculture are already doing a pretty excellent activity on each one’s counts. Male grooming, for example, is rising dramatically. There has been an explosion in skincare and anti-getting older lotions for men as more men grow increasingly concerned about their wrinkles; more than one-third of American dads say they care about stopping the symptoms of getting old, according to a 2018 Mintel take a look at. Men also appear to be increasingly more self-aware of their frame hair; consistent with Kantar statistics, hair removal products are the fastest developing class in the toiletry market for male customers, up 25% year-on-year within the UK. Body photo troubles are also growing among men, with studies suggesting that guys are as unhappy with their appearance as women are. We appear to be marching right away towards a future in which women and men are equally plagued using unrealistic expectations approximately how they ought to look, which have been concocted through the fashion and splendor industries. While it seems to be taking us a very long term to close the gender pay hole, we’re doing a notable process in remaining the arrival-lack of confidence hole. Something to feel joyful approximately, I assume!