Breaking News
Home / Internet / Ex-workers sue Apple, seek overtime for daily bag searches

Ex-workers sue Apple, seek overtime for daily bag searches

Two former Apple Inc. employees have accused the iPhone maker in a lawsuit of subjecting hourly retailer employees to day by day searches whereas they were off-the-clock, arguing they will have to be compensated.The “screenings” or bag searches, designed to discourage theft, are performed each time gross sales reps depart the shop, together with for meal breaks, the plaintiffs alleged in a lawsuit filed July 25 in a San Francisco federal court docket.They are looking for unpaid wages, time beyond regulation compensation and other penalties related to what they say is an established apply throughout Apple’s U.S. showrooms. the 2 plaintiffs said they worked for Apple over a variety of years, from California to Georgia and Florida.

Shares tumble (Image credit: Reuters)

In bother for unpaid wages

complaints from inside Apple’s ranks are uncommon, partially for the reason that firm is known to command loyalty amongst its workers. In 2011 alternatively, a part-time worker at an Apple retailer in San Francisco sought to type a union to struggle for better wages and advantages and to deal with what he referred to as unfair practices inside the firm’s showrooms.each plaintiffs, who are seeking category-action standing on behalf of every current and former Apple hourly employee, estimated in their lawsuit that they frequently waited in line for roughly 5 to 10 minutes or extra before present process each and every take a look can be doubtful whether the policy extends past Apple’s house shores. the corporate has more four hundred shops worldwide.”This work, done primarily for the company’s benefit, is time which Apple hourly employees must be, however will not be compensated for, both straight hours and time beyond regulation hours labored in excess of 40 hours a week,” the lawsuit read.Apple didn’t reply to requests for comment.The case in U.S. Northern District court docket is Amanda Flaking and Dean Pelé et al v Apple Inc., three:13-cv-03451-EDL