Tuesday , September 2 2014
Whatz Hot :-
Home / Internet / Latest Internet News / The real-life consequences of a Facebook unfriending

The real-life consequences of a Facebook unfriending

face 610x310 300x152 The real life consequences of a Facebook unfriending

Facebook unfriending

Which came first? The unfriend or the unfriending?

This is the disturbingly scientific thought that wracks my sinews on hearing of a devastating piece of research performed by the University of Colorado Denver.

You might have thought that the virtual world is just that, that Facebook is merely a collection of make-believe friends who make believe that they’re interesting — and interested in you.

Allegedly not.

This research insists that if someone unfriends you on Facebook, it alters your behavior — yes, your real-world behavior.

A fulsome and neurotic 40 percent of people admitted that if someone defriended them on Facebook, they would do everything they could to ensure that they would never be seen with that person in the real world.

Women were, apparently, more inclined to execute avoidance procedures than were men.

You might wonder what could possibly make people behave so radically with respect to what might be a virtual snub, but might also be a slip of the finger or a temporary chilling of the brain.

This research concluded that the most important factor in deciding whether one should instigate avoidance tactics was whether the defriender had talked about the defriending to others.

Yes, perhaps even in real life.

The mere thought that, gosh, someone else knows — thus making the defriending, well, real — would drive people to go 10 miles out of the way to eat at Wendy’s, instead of wafting into their local Outback Steakhouse.

You might wonder why people defriend others in the first place, though. Could it be because they don’t like a new profile picture or because the person has posted too many videos of cats trying to have animated relations with inanimate objects?

Fortunately, the author of this study, a doctoral student in the Computer Science and Information Systems program called Christopher Sibona, performed another feat of research to delve into these depths.

Indeed, you’re most likely to be defriended for offering too many dull posts, for too much extremity about politics or religion, for sexism and racism, for too many posts about your kids and your dinner or for changing your status from “single” to “it’s complicated” more than three times a week.

Actually, I made that last one up. But the summation of this is surely that you’re most likely to be defriended for being virtually annoying.

Some might see a certain absurdity, though, in this research.

Let’s assume for a moment that your Facebook friends aren’t quite as important to you as your real friends.

Why would you be concerned if one of your Facebook friends cut you off?

Might it really be because the number of friends you have would be reduced by one, there for all to see?

Soon, you fear getting messages from Facebook friends saying: “Oh, I see your numbers are down today. You’re just not as popular anymore, huh?”

There is nothing worse than when your (virtual) personal stock goes down, is there?

[source:cnet]

Facebook

8 comments

  1. Wavatar

    A liberal that’s politically incorrect which is professional existence, for example.

    In comparison to, allows say, a gay and professional choice conservative free thinker.

    Ardi Pitherus, “The initial concept of “liberal” was the concept of a “free thinker”. ”

    Newsflash: Libs don’t like original meanings any longer, they simply prefer to redefine everything to really make it squeeze into their collective psychosis!

  2. Wavatar

    On another answer, I had been speaking concerning the conservation of matter. Then someone stated in my experience that matter can become energy. (i.e. anti-matter and matter reaction converts to photons).

    But according to Einstein’s description of mass-energy equivalence, could it be technically incorrect to state the principle of “matter is conserved, sometimes by means of energy”, or perhaps is it more correct to state “matter is destroyed, and is produced”?

  3. Wavatar

    1. Let us walk fast versus. let us walk faster. What’s the difference?

    2. Let us walk quickly versus. Let us walk quickly versus. Let us walk fast. What’s the difference? What is the slight difference of meanings?

  4. Wavatar

    Which sentence is wrong?

    (1) “Gus’s cow were built with a calf.”

    (2) “Gus’ cow were built with a calf.”

    (3) “Henry’s cat had cats.”

    (4) “Henrys cat had cats.”

  5. Wavatar

    http://solutions.yahoo.com/question/index_ylt=Au0v7CJb_w_t4zujQBWIN_3sy6IX_ylv=3?qid=20080218123124AA7g2JY

    holy garbage!! take a look at “my preshus’s” answer. frigging Amusing

    that’s easily the funniest factor i have observed in several weeks.

    that’s true, dude.

  6. Wavatar

    Could it be offensive to individuals who pray the rosary everyday the Rosary Catholics? I’ve found it’s a beautiful method to address them.

  7. Wavatar
    Dorsey Hausteen

    is facebook costly

Leave a Reply for your confusion